Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aging involves progressive changes across interconnected biological pathways, but minimally invasive approaches for assessing these processes remain limited. We used serum protein profiling to characterize age-associated differences in 8- and 32-month-old male CB6F1J and C57BL/6J mice. Circulating proteins were mapped to established hallmarks of aging and evaluated for age- and strain-dependent patterns. Differences were identified across inflammatory, vascular, intercellular communication, metabolism, and tissue maintenance pathways. After Benjamini-Hochberg correction, 45 proteins remained significant at FDR q < 0.05 in CB6F1J mice and none in C57BL/6J mice. Hallmark-level analyses were therefore based primarily on all mapped proteins, with FDR-defined subsets considered secondary. Hallmark categories showed substantial overlap, and analyses restricted to uniquely assigned proteins showed attenuated cross-strain concordance. These findings demonstrate that serum protein profiling can capture hallmark-level age-associated differences across genetic backgrounds. As this study compared only two age groups cross-sectionally, the findings do not establish aging trajectories but provide a framework for future longitudinal serum-based assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: