Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Long-term lung function trajectories during dupilumab treatment remain insufficiently characterized. We characterized post-treatment FEV1 trajectories in patients with asthma who continued dupilumab for 3 years and explored whether persistent fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was associated with a less favorable trajectory. Methods This single-center retrospective study included 41 of 60 patients with physician-confirmed asthma who initiated dupilumab for asthma at Niigata University between March 2019 and August 2022 and continued treatment for 3 years. Post-treatment FEV1 slopes were estimated using values obtained at 4 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years. Decliners were defined as patients with an annual FEV1 slope more negative than − 30 mL/year. Persistent FeNO was defined as FeNO ≥ 20 ppb at ≥ 2 of the 1-, 2-, and 3-year visits. Maintenance treatment was assessed throughout follow-up, and 3-year prescription-based adherence and ICS exposure were evaluated in 38 patients with complete prescription records. Results Seventeen patients were classified as decliners. Both groups showed an early increase in FEV1; thereafter, FEV1 gradually decreased in decliners but remained relatively stable in non-decliners. Persistent FeNO was associated with a less favorable FEV1 slope and remained associated with decliner status after adjustment for age and baseline % FEV1 (adjusted OR, 21.8; 95% CI, 2.61–183; p = 0.004). FeNO at 1 year was inversely correlated with post-treatment FEV1 slope (Spearman’s ρ = −0.329; p = 0.036). No significant between-group differences were observed in 3-year prescribed ICS intensity, prescription-based ICS exposure, or prescription-based adherence. Conclusions In this selected cohort of patients with asthma who continued dupilumab for 3 years, long-term post-treatment FEV1 trajectories were heterogeneous. Persistent post-treatment FeNO was associated with a less favorable FEV1 trajectory. These exploratory findings require validation in larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naramoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: