Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Future intelligent environments require infrastructure-native interfaces that can sense human activities and directly generate wireless communication events using standard protocols. Achieving this remains challenging because human footsteps are transient, irregular, and often low-force, whereas standard wireless protocols such as Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) require substantial energy consumption. In this work, we present a self-powered floor interface that addresses this challenge through coordinated material, structural, and circuit design. The system integrates a high-performance PMN–PZT ceramic with a piezoelectric charge constant of d 33 = 962 pC/N for efficient energy transduction, a carefully engineered metallic substrate for enhanced stress transfer and recoverability, a threshold-regulated energy management circuit that regulates transient outputs into a usable burst-power window, and an ultra-low-power BLE interface for protocol-compatible transmission. With a 4.7 μF storage capacitor, the circuit provides 22.84 μJ of releasable energy, exceeding the approximately 17 μJ required for BLE cold start. Despite a footprint of only 30 mm, sub-millimeter thickness, and a prototype-level unit cost below $5, the system enables direct wireless triggering from a light actuation of approximately 12 N. Across 100 footstep trials involving 10 participants, the system achieved an average of 2.39 BLE packets per actuation, with up to 4 packets generated per event, and successfully delivered at least one wireless transmission in 97% of the trials. The proposed system directly translates irregular footsteps into reliable protocol-compatible wireless events and enables infrastructure-integrated human-environment interactions, including smart-home control, indoor localization, digital-twin interaction, and transportation-safety alerting. These results establish a practical route toward compact infrastructure-native battery-free interaction systems for future intelligent environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: