Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Massive quiescent galaxies (MQGs; M_ ~ 10¹¹ \, M_) at cosmic noon (z ~ 2) host $α$-enhanced stellar populations ([Mg/Fe] ~ 0.4 - 0.5) at near-solar [Fe/H], implying rapid formation histories that spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting alone constrains poorly. To determine the physical conditions and formation timescales that generate these abundances, we employ a one-zone chemical evolution model with nucleosynthetic yields calibrated against resolved stars in the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal. Comparing our model to a compilation of observed abundances, we find MQGs are consistent with rapid formation timescales of ΔtSF ~ 0.1 - 0.4 \, Gyr. The progenitors must sustain high star-formation efficiencies (approximately the molecular gas depletion time; τ_ ~ 0.05 \, Gyr) and retain most of their metal-enriched ejecta (η~ 0), consistent with high-redshift dusty star-forming galaxies (DSFGs). However, our model favours moderately active progenitors with typical star-formation rates (SFRs) of 200-400 \, M_ \, yr⁻¹, matching recently identified `NIRCam-dark' galaxies more closely than the broader DSFG population. Sustained starbursts (SFR 1000 \, M_ \, yr⁻¹) are disfavoured, since they would form most stellar mass before significant SN Ia enrichment and underproduce the observed [Fe/H]. The same framework also reproduces the central abundances of local early-type galaxies over longer timescales (ΔtSF ~ 0.6 - 1 \, Gyr). Chemical abundances can therefore provide powerful constraints on the formation histories of MQGs, and incorporating them into SED-fitting routines will ensure inferred histories remain consistent with the observed chemistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Connor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: