Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Agricultural insurance is widely recognized as an economic instrument for dispersing production risk, yet whether it yields environmental co-benefits remains underexplored. This study shifts the focus beyond risk mitigation by examining how agricultural insurance shapes crop carbon absorption. Methods Drawing on a 14-year panel of 333 prefecture-level cities in China, we combine a two-way fixed effects model augmented with province-by-year interaction effects, an instrumental variable approach, and a robust heterogeneous Difference-in-Differences approach to establish causality. Results The results show that agricultural insurance significantly enhances crop carbon absorption. Mechanism analyses trace this effect to the reshaping of farmers’ production decisions: structural adjustment toward staple crop cultivation and scale expansion through a higher multiple cropping index. Heterogeneity analyses corroborate these channels, revealing stronger effects in major grain-producing areas and regions with larger per capita arable land. The carbon benefits are also more pronounced in economically underdeveloped areas and regions where non-agricultural industries are less developed. Discussion Beyond risk mitigation, agricultural insurance thus serves as a policy lever translating micro-level farmer behavior into macro-level ecological gains, and the resulting carbon absorption co-benefit deserves greater weight in future insurance design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: