This note explains how quantum logic gates work, which gate sets are universal, and why non-Clifford (T) gates dominate the cost of fault-tolerant computation. Comparing public results across six platforms with evidence up to 7 October 2026: in the peer-reviewed literature, single-qubit error on a single ion reaches 1.5×10⁻⁷ and best single-pair two-qubit errors lie in the 10⁻³–10⁻⁴ range, while about 8.4×10⁻⁵ on a two-ion prototype remains a preprint; system-wide averages can be about an order of magnitude worse than best single-pair values (for example, 7.9×10⁻⁴ on the 98-qubit Helios, and 0.33% CZ error with all gates running simultaneously on Willow's error-correction chip according to Google's specification). Because reporting conventions differ, cross-platform comparisons are indicative only. The note then reviews the move from physical to logical gates — lattice surgery, logical non-Clifford gates and magic-state preparation — most of which remain at small code distance, some with postselection, and many still in preprints. It is a structured evidence synthesis and technical guide based on public literature and reports no new experiments or measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yulin Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: