This data and publication package constitutes Volume 4 of the Project Antigravity exoplanet catalog. Mining continuous optical photometry from the NASA Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), our autonomous GPU-accelerated Box Least Squares (BLS) pipeline screened 11,386 stellar light curves, identifying a new cohort of 413 vetted transiting planetary candidates, headlined by 40 top-tier SS-Rank discoveries (Signal-to-Noise Ratios extending up to 34.1). Highlights of this release include:1. 81 Earth-sized candidates (Rp <= 1.4 R_Earth), including the ultra-short-period Earth-analog twin TIC 77092856 (Rp ~ 1.40 R_Earth, P = 0.501 d) transiting a bright solar-type star (Tmag = 10.68) in Fornax, and TIC 86184740 (Rp ~ 1.28 R_Earth, P = 0.557 d, SNR = 21.8) in Ursa Major.2. 189 Super-Earth candidates, led by TIC 268104207 (Rp ~ 2.44 R_Earth, P = 0.558 d, SNR = 34.1) orbiting a nearby cool K-dwarf at 464 light-years.3. 26 Jovian / gas giant candidates with transit depths up to 38,000 ppm. Package Contents:- Project_Antigravity_SS_Rank_Cohort_Manuscript.pdf: Complete formal research note manuscript ready for AAS review.- RNAAS_Paper_SS_Rank_Cohort_20261027.tex: AAS-compliant LaTeX manuscript source.- Figure1_RNAAS_Batch20261027_TopCandidates.png: 300-DPI composite 4-panel phase-folded light curves.- Project_Antigravity_Master_Catalog_Vol4_413_Planets.csv: Machine-readable tabular catalog of all 413 candidates with coordinates, transit periods, depths, and SNR.- Project_Antigravity_Master_Catalog_Vol4_413_Planets.json: Full structured metadata JSON format.- top_candidate_plots/: High-resolution diagnostic validation plots for premier SS-rank systems. This dataset expands the cumulative Project Antigravity catalog to 1,328 vetted transiting exoplanet candidates. All materials are open-access under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Related DOIs:- Volume 1 (Antigravity-1 to 8): 10.5281/zenodo.23605892- Volume 2 (Candidates 9 to 251): 10.5281/zenodo.23629591- Volume 3 (Candidates 252 to 773): 10.5281/zenodo.23652074
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tetsuo Ohizumi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: