Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A concentration-dependent investigation of Fe-doped anatase TiO2 was performed using the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method implemented in WIEN2k, combined with GGA, GGA+U, and physics-informed neural network (PINN) modeling. Fe concentrations of 3.125%, 6.25%, 12.5%, and 25% were examined using 2 × 2 × 2 anatase TiO2 supercells. Fe incorporation systematically expands the anatase lattice, with the equilibrium volume increasing from 17.14 Å3/f.u. for pristine TiO2 to 18.49 Å3/f.u. within GGA and up to 18.91 Å3/f.u. using Hubbard-corrected treatments at 25% Fe. The bulk modulus decreases from 179.2 GPa to 160.5 GPa in GGA, indicating concentration-driven lattice softening, while the formation energy becomes more negative, reaching −10.91 eV/f.u. for GGA+UTi+UFe at 25% Fe. Electronically, Fe doping introduces localized Fe-3d impurity states within the forbidden gap, narrowing the band gap from 2.18 eV for pristine TiO2 to 1.23 eV in GGA and to 1.59 eV in GGA+UTi+UFe at 25% Fe. The ferromagnetic magnetic moment increases with Fe concentration, reaching 4.41 μB/f.u. for the combined Hubbard correction. Optical calculations reveal enhanced dielectric, conductivity, absorption, reflectivity, and loss responses in the visible-to-near-UV range due to Fe-3d/O-2p/Ti-3d hybridization. The PINN model closely reproduces the FP-LAPW/GGA+U trends, including band gaps from 2.25 eV at 3.125% Fe to 1.48 eV at 25% Fe, demonstrating its usefulness as an efficient surrogate for correlated-property prediction. These results establish Fe doping as an effective route for multifunctional tuning of anatase TiO2 for photocatalytic, photovoltaic, optoelectronic, and spintronic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousif Shoaib Mohammed (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: