Background Selective mutism (SM) is an anxiety disorder characterized by a persistent failure to speak in specific social situations despite speaking normally in others. Preliminary evidence suggests that intensive behavioral group interventions may be a promising treatment approach. This pilot study evaluated the outcomes of such an intervention for children with SM for the first time in a German clinical sample. Methods Sixteen children aged five to nine with SM were included in the study and fifteen participated in an intensive group intervention based on Parent-Child-Interaction Therapy for Selective Mutism (PCIT-SM). Two baseline, one post-treatment, and one three-month follow-up assessments were conducted. Primary outcome was parent-rated SM symptom severity assessed with the Frankfurt Scale for Selective Mutism (FSSM). Remission status based on a structured clinical interview served as secondary outcome. Changes over time were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models and Cochran’s Q tests. Results SM symptom severity decreased significantly over time with large effects from baseline 1 to post-treatment ( d RM = 1.03) and follow-up ( d RM = 1.69). No significant differences emerged between the two baseline assessments. Remission rates increased from 0% at first baseline to 47% at follow-up. A significant overall change in diagnostic status across assessments was observed. Exploratory analyses further showed that general anxiety decreased from baseline to follow-up. Conclusions The findings provide preliminary support for intensive group interventions based on PCIT-SM principles as a promising treatment for children with SM. Future controlled studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to evaluate treatment mechanisms and long-term outcomes. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00040917, retrospectively registered on 13 July 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwenck et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: