Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study reviews green high-speed railway (HSR) development in China from a full-life-cycle perspective, focusing on key environmental practices, challenges and future priorities. Design/methodology/approach A structured review of peer-reviewed studies, policy documents, industry standards and railway-sector reports is conducted across six dimensions: land use and biodiversity, embodied carbon, operational energy and emissions, noise and vibration, water and soil environment, and solid-waste management. Findings China has made progress in route optimization, ecological mitigation, prefabricated construction, noise control and environmental monitoring. However, evidence remains fragmented regarding life-cycle trade-offs, project-level indicator application and waste-treatment technology selection. Existing green railway indicator systems require clearer definitions, data support, weighting methods, thresholds and empirical validation. For station and on-board waste, source reduction, separation and recycling should be prioritized, while refuse-derived fuel, pyrolysis and gasification require site-specific feasibility and life-cycle assessment. Originality/value This study integrates environmental impacts, policy frameworks and waste-management strategies into a full-life-cycle evidence framework, highlighting key methodological, data and governance priorities for future green HSR research and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: