Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most frequently performed ENT procedures. Coblation tonsillectomy has been introduced as an alternative to conventional cold-steel dissection with the aim of reducing tissue injury, postoperative pain, and recovery time. Methods: This prospective randomized comparative study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Sudha Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India, over a six-month period from 14 January to 30 June 2026. Fifty patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A underwent conventional cold-steel dissection tonsillectomy (n=25), while Group B underwent coblation tonsillectomy (n=25). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), time to oral intake, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared. Results: Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Coblation tonsillectomy showed significantly shorter operative time (24.5±3.8 vs. 30.8±4.9 minutes; p<0.001), lower intraoperative blood loss (31.4±9.8 vs. 74.6±16.2 mL; p<0.001), and reduced requirement for additional haemostasis (12% vs. 40%; p=0.024). Postoperative pain scores at 24 hours and day 7 were significantly lower in the coblation group (p<0.001). Patients treated with coblation resumed oral intake earlier, returned to a normal diet sooner, and had a shorter hospital stay (all p<0.01). Although postoperative haemorrhage and other complications were numerically lower in the coblation group, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Coblation tonsillectomy offers superior operative efficiency and improved postoperative recovery compared with conventional cold-steel dissection while maintaining a similar safety profile. It represents an effective and reliable alternative for elective tonsillectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Datta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: