The purpose of this study was to examine learner feedback for the Professional Development for All (PDFA) program to understand participant experiences and better identify opportunities for course improvement. As a modular, self-paced digital initiative at the University of Central Florida, the PDFA program was designed to expand access to professional learning for nontraditional learners facing severe financial, scheduling, and self-efficacy barriers. Utilizing the Kirkpatrick Model (1998) as a guiding framework, the study employed a convergent mixed-methods design to analyze survey feedback from a self-selected sample of participants (n = 214) drawn from 1,816 enrollments. During the study period, 1,609 learners earned digital badges, reflecting an 88.6% completion rate. Qualitative and quantitative analyses identified three primary themes: course modality, instructional delivery, and requested revisions. Quantitative data indicated high satisfaction, with 96.2% of respondents reporting positive overall sentiment. Qualitatively, participants expressed a strong preference for flexible, asynchronous pacing and relevant content while identifying critical needs for enhanced multimodal accessibility and interactive assessments. Implications suggest that modular, technology-enhanced instructional frameworks offer a scalable model for reaching underserved nontraditional populations, while feedback provides a clear roadmap for future course revisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: