Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
H3K27ac epigenetically modulates gene expression and serves as an indicator of cancer status. Although aberrant H3K27ac has been widely studied, a comprehensive landscape of cancer-specific H3K27ac patterns remains lacking. By integrating 209 H3K27ac ChIP-seq datasets across 48 tissues and cell types, we defined 3612 universally conserved regions and a vast repertoire of cancer-specific H3K27ac alterations. Strikingly, while cancer-specific H3K27ac gains were pervasive across leukemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, and lymphoma, losses were remarkably rare. These cancer-specific H3K27ac gains were predominantly enriched in non-coding regions, where they were associated with increased chromatin accessibility and chromatin interactions, enabling the recruitment of oncogenic transcription factors to activate target genes. Conversely, cancer-specific H3K27ac losses preferentially occurred in promoters and correlated with chromatin compaction and transcriptional repression. Mechanistic multi-omics analyses in leukemia further demonstrated this epigenetic-structural coupling. Leukemia-specific H3K27ac gains established a permissive chromatin environment that facilitated oncogenic GATA1 binding and activation of its target gene TAL1. Within this context, TAL1 exhibited increased interaction with STIL, a well-known fusion partner implicated in leukemogenesis. To enable broader application of these findings, we developed an open-access web server for genomic annotation. Collectively, our study provides a comprehensive landscape of cancer-specific H3K27ac modifications, defining them as a functional epigenetic signature of oncogenic chromatin remodeling and offering an annotation resource for understanding the regulation of the cancer genome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: