Key result
Prolonged baseline QTc is linked to ~1% higher risk of functional disability after stroke.
Why the study?
Does baseline QTc interval prolongation or other ventricular repolarization parameters predict functional neurological disability and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with acute stroke?
Cohort (n=565)
No
Does baseline QTc interval prolongation or other ventricular repolarization parameters predict functional neurological disability and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with acute stroke?
Baseline QTc prolongation (>480 ms) on routine admission ECG is an accessible, independent marker of worse in-hospital functional neurological outcomes in patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
QTc prolongation may flag higher disability risk in acute stroke; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Catarine Benta Lopes dos Santos , Sérgio Ferreira de Ferreira Filho , Marcelo Angst , Anderson Donelli da Silveira , Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins , Mauricio Pimentel DOI: 10.36660/ijcs.20250206 The electrocardiogram (ECG) is routinely used in stroke evaluation, although interactions within the brain–heart axis remain incompletely understood. The prognostic relevance of the QTc interval and other ventricular repolarization markers has gained increasing interest in stroke populations. To evaluate the association of QTc interval, QTc dispersion (QTc-d), Tpeak–end interval (Tp-e), and Tp-e/QTc ratio with neurological disability and in-hospital mortality in acute stroke. This retrospective cohort included patients admitted with acute stroke between January 2018 and April 2020. QTc was analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable, using a cutoff of 480 ms. Functional disability was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and categorized as no disability (mRS ≤ 2) or disability (mRS > 2). Sample size calculation indicated a minimum of 482 patients (85% power; 5% significance), based on functional outcome differences between prolonged and normal QTc. A 5% significance level was used for all analyses. A total of 565 patients were included (50.1% male; mean age 65 ± 13 years). Of these, 280 (49.6%) had mRS > 2, and 69 (12.5%) died during hospitalization. Higher QTc values were associated with worse neurological outcomes in univariable (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; p < 0.001) and multivariable analyses adjusted for age and NIHSS (HR 1.009; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; p = 0.001). QTc > 480 ms was also associated with disability in univariable (HR 2.43) and multivariable models (HR 2.67). QTc was not associated with in-hospital mortality. QTc prolongation, particularly QTc > 480 ms, was independently associated with unfavorable neurological outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) (n=565). Baseline QTc interval prolongation (continuous QTc and categorical QTc > 480 ms) vs. Normal QTc interval (≤ 480 ms) or lower baseline QTc values was evaluated on Functional neurological disability at hospital discharge (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] > 2) (HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.003-1.015, p=0.001). Prolonged baseline QTc interval was independently associated with worse functional disability at hospital discharge in acute stroke (multivariable HR 1.009, p=0.001; QTc >480 ms HR 2.676, p=0.024).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: