This study examined the influence of higher education service quality on students’ satisfaction in a public university in Chengdu, China. Six dimensions were investigated: University Access (UA), University Reputation (UR), Academic Aspects (AA), Non-Academic Aspects (NAA), Program Issues (PI), and Perceived Value (PV). A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted, and data were collected from 90 third- and fourth-year undergraduate students. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression were used for analysis. The results showed that all six service quality dimensions and students’ satisfaction were rated at a high level. The regression model was statistically significant and explained a substantial proportion of the variance in students’ satisfaction. Among the six predictors, Academic Aspects, Program Issues, and Perceived Value had significant positive effects, while University Access, University Reputation, and Non-Academic Aspects did not show significant effects. Perceived Value was the strongest predictor. The findings suggest that improving academic support, program-related quality, and students’ perceived value may be especially important for enhancing satisfaction in public higher education institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing Qing (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: