Objective We examined whether card-event rates were higher in the final 15 min of regulation time and second-half stoppage time than in earlier periods (H1), and whether home-trailing status at the start of a time window was associated with subsequent home- and away-team card-event rates (H2). A secondary, exploratory analysis compared temporal associations before and from the 2018/19 season onward (H3), using an era proxy rather than actual video assistant referee (VAR) exposure. Methods This retrospective observational study included 519 FC Barcelona La Liga matches from 2004/05 to 2020/21 in StatsBomb Open Data in which Lionel Messi had a recorded playing position and the required files were available. H1 and H3 used three periods (0–75 min, 75–90 min, and second-half stoppage time), whereas H2 used six 15-min regulation-time windows and a second-half stoppage-time window. Outcomes comprised Yellow Card, Second Yellow, and Red Card events. Poisson regression used exposure-time offsets and match-clustered robust standard errors; the primary H1 model adjusted for recorded foul intensity and other covariates. Results Across 3,114 team-by-period observations, adjusted total card-event rates were higher at 75–90 min (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.487, 95% CI 1.353–1.634) and in second-half stoppage time (IRR = 1.766, 95% CI 1.480–2.108), both p < 0.001. For Foul Committed-linked cards, the corresponding IRRs were 1.324 (95% CI 1.195–1.467) and 0.967 (95% CI 0.776–1.203). The Bad Behaviour share increased descriptively from 16.11% to 43.09%. Home-trailing status at window onset was not significantly associated with subsequent away-team card-event rates (IRR = 0.981, 95% CI 0.858–1.121). Era-by-period interactions provided no clear evidence of change. Conclusion Late-match total card-event rates were higher conditional on recorded foul intensity, and the stoppage-time card composition shifted toward Bad Behaviour. The analyses did not formally establish different temporal associations by event source. These patterns do not demonstrate decision inaccuracy or referee bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: