To address the distortion of temporal trends and structures caused by differential privacy noise, this paper proposes a differentially private time-series release method based on multiscale energy features and noise covariance optimization, termed Wavelet Energy and Covariance Optimization-Based Differential Privacy (WECO-DP). The proposed method normalizes time series using fixed public bounds and employs public calibration data separate from the protected input to predetermine scale-specific energy weights, fixed coefficient positions, and the number of retained coefficients at each scale, thereby constructing a fixed wavelet query. Under an adjacency relation defined by a change at a single time point, worst-case sensitivity constraints are established by analyzing the responses of the fixed query to changes at different time positions. The scale-specific energy weights are then incorporated into the noise optimization objective to jointly determine the Gaussian noise variances across scales. Subsequently, a single Gaussian perturbation is applied to the retained wavelet coefficients, and the released series is obtained through the inverse discrete wavelet transform. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that WECO-DP satisfies event-level (ε, δ)-differential privacy. Experimental results on three real-world time-series datasets involving water consumption, electricity consumption, and unemployment rates show that WECO-DP generally achieves lower root mean square error and mean absolute error than five baseline methods under different privacy budgets. Ablation experiments and structure-preservation analysis further demonstrate the contributions of fixed coefficient selection, scale-specific energy weighting, and scale-specific noise variance optimization to release utility. WECO-DP reduces the influence of privacy perturbation on the principal structural information of time series while satisfying event-level privacy constraints, thereby improving the utility of the released data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaoyu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: