This study analyzes the appointment of a judge guardian (wali hakim) in cases of recalcitrant guardians (wali adhal) at the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) in Jepara Regency (2020–2025). Using a qualitative descriptive approach and field research across KUA Kembang, Mlonggo, and Jepara, this study employs Lewis A. Coser’s conflict theory and structural-functional theory. The findings indicate that the appointment procedure follows a structured mechanism: administrative examination, clarification, family-based mediation, judicial referral to the Religious Court, and the execution of the marriage contract by the wali hakim. Causes of wali adhal are non-uniform, driven by underlying structural and interpersonal conflicts, including disparities in education level, economic instability, family breakdowns, and parental objections to the chosen partner. To resolve these challenges, the KUA performs a threefold role as an administrative body, a social mediator, and a legal educator. Consequently, the mechanism serves as a vital legal safeguard to protect women’s marital rights and resolve domestic power imbalances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dina Cahyani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: