This perspective proposes a trustworthy structural-health-monitoring architecture for critical aerospace structures in which no measurement source is treated as absolute ground truth. The framework integrates full-field infrared thermography T(x,y,t), point structural sensors, operational-state information, a multiphysics digital twin, and physics-informed artificial intelligence. The central research question is not merely whether an anomaly exists, but where the inconsistency most probably originates: the physical structure, a point sensor, the infrared measurement system, or the digital model itself. Recent aerospace research has demonstrated real-time sensing digital twins capable of distinguishing structural degradation from sensor faults and quantifying sensor reliability, while NASA has demonstrated synchronized passive thermography and acoustic emission for real-time damage-growth assessment. These advances establish strong prior art for individual components of the proposed framework. The opportunity investigated here is therefore narrower: to use a calibrated full-field thermal field as an independent spatial observer, explicitly assess the integrity of the thermographic measurement chain, and cross-validate it against point sensing and physics-based predictions. The paper defines the architecture, competing diagnostic hypotheses, falsifiable research hypotheses, and a staged validation route. It does not claim experimental validation or definitive patent novelty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero Augusto Botelho (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: