Objective: Despite the increasing use of telerehabilitation, few studies have examined its effectiveness for core stabilization exercises in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) with lumbar instability (LI). This study compared telerehabilitation-based versus clinic-based delivery of core stabilization exercise with abdominal drawing-in maneuver (CSE with ADIM) on pain, functional disability, lumbar joint repositioning error (LJRE), quality of life, and satisfaction in individuals with CNSLBP and LI.Material and Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial that included 30 participants with CNSLBP and LI, randomized to telerehabilitation-based (n=15) or clinic-based (n=15) groups. Both groups completed 7 weeks of CSE with ADIM; the telerehabilitation-based group received training via video calls, while the clinic-based group received in-person training. Pain, functional disability, quality of life, and LJRE were measured at baseline and post-intervention; satisfaction was assessed at completion.Results: Both groups demonstrated significant within-group reductions in pain (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and functional disability scores (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]; p-value<0.05), with no significant between-group differences. Telerehabilitation-based delivery improved in most SF-36 domains except the social function domain, whereas clinic-based training improved in only the physical function domain. LJRE had no significant changes within and between groups. Training adherence was high (96%) with high satisfaction (telerehabilitation-based: 4.94±0.08; clinic-based: 4.87±0.20). No adverse events occurred.Conclusion: Telerehabilitation-delivered CSE-ADIM is an effective alternative to clinic-based care for reducing pain and improving functional disability and quality of life in CNSLBP with LI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kongsa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: