Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human decision-making in candidate selection is inherently susceptible to cognitive heuristics and systematic biases, including the halo effect, confirmation bias, and similarity-attraction bias. While structured recruitment practices are empirically established as robust interventions to enhance evaluative objectivity, the psychological relationship between a recruiter?s cognitive bias awareness and their execution of structured selection protocols remains underexplored within emerging market contexts. Grounded in Dual-Process Theory and Bounded Rationality, this study examines the relationship between Cognitive Bias Awareness (X) and Structured Recruitment Decision-Making (Y) among Talent Acquisition (TA) professionals operating in India. Utilizing a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were analyzed for N = 67 active corporate recruiters via the adapted Cognitive Bias Awareness Scale (CBAS) and the Structured Recruitment Decision-Making Scale (SRDMS). Statistical analyses including Pearson product-moment correlation (r), simple linear regression (?, R?), and sub-group parametric tests were conducted to evaluate hypotheses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radha Lingal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: