High turbidity and elevated dissolved iron are the two most persistent water quality problems facing tropical river communities in Kalimantan, Indonesia, where both parameters regularly exceed the limits set by the WHO. We investigated how well a continuous-flow hybrid biochar–zeolite column reactor could remove turbidity and dissolved iron at the same time, working through 100 controlled experimental runs using synthetic river water. Three operating variables were tested—influent turbidity (50, 150, and 300 NTU), hydraulic loading rate (0.3, 0.5, and 0.8 L min⁻¹)—and biochar-to-zeolite ratio (0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1)—arranged in a factorial design. Iron adsorption equilibrium was described by Langmuir (qmax = 18.5 mg g⁻¹; KL = 0.62 L mg⁻¹; R² = 0.961) and Freundlich (Kf = 6.2 mg g⁻¹; n = 2.1; R² = 0.943) isotherms, and breakthrough dynamics were described by the Thomas kinetic model. Mean turbidity removal efficiency was 83.93 ± 5.10% (range: 74.52–93.18%) and mean iron removal efficiency was 72.06 ± 7.05% (range: 55.83–85.71%). Among all variables tested, hydraulic loading rate had by far the greatest influence, showing a strong inverse relationship with turbidity removal (r = −0.919) and iron removal (r = −0.848; both p < 0.001). We then built predictive models using multiple linear regression (MLR) and Random Forest regression (RFR, 200 estimators). The RFR model gave more accurate iron removal predictions (R² = 0.921, MAE = 1.89%), while MLR worked well enough for turbidity (R² = 0.859). Partial dependence plots and interaction heatmaps consistently pointed to 0.3 L min⁻¹and a 1:1 media ratio as the best overall operating condition. The results indicate that this hybrid system is a promising, low-cost pre-treatment option for decentralised rural water supply in tropical settings where both particulate and dissolved iron contamination occur together, pending confirmatory testing with natural river water containing dissolved organic matter and competing ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zubaidah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: