Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the generalized k-server problem, each of k servers moves in its own metric space, and a request (r₁,,rₖ) is served once some server i stands at the point rᵢ of its space. We determine the randomized competitive ratio against an oblivious adversary when every space is a uniform metric. With unit distances the ratio is Θ(klog k): we give a (k+1)ln(2k)-competitive algorithm and show that for large k every algorithm has ratio at least 1/20kln k, improving the bounds O(k²log k) and $Ω(k)$ of Bienkowski, Jeż, and Schmidt. When server i pays wᵢ per move, the ratio is exp(Θ(k)): we give a 20ᵏ-competitive algorithm, which also applies to weighted k-server on uniform metrics. This improves the exp(O(k²)) bound of Bijoy, Mondal, and Chiplunkar and matches the Ω(2ᵏ) lower bound of Ayyadevara and Chiplunkar up to the base of the exponent. Both algorithms follow normalized weights exactly, through couplings whose expected movement is controlled by the decrease of the logarithm of the total weight. The lower bound hides a random permutation among the solutions of random permutation constraints, which split into small, well-separated components, and then forbids one position to one server at a time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junho Hwang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: