Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lists and cataloguers of earthquakes are frequently used for both popular and scientific purposes. Occasionally such lists are compiled without suitable discrimination including all the shocks, small and large, which may happen to come to notice. Under such circumstances the number of earthquakes listed for any given region is likely to be a better index of the density of population than of the seismicity; for minor shocks are very frequent in all seismic regions, and even in many districts not commonly thought of as seismically active. Similar undiscriminating use of instrumental data gives undue weight to minor shocks occurring near seismological stations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutenberg et al. (1936) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: