We develop a Mars-centered post-Newtonian framework relating barycentric and Mars-centered coordinate times, a conventional Mars surface timescale, and proper times of landed and orbiting clocks. Following the IAU reference system formalism, we introduce Areocentric Coordinate Time (TCA) and separate secular rates from zero-mean periodic terms. Contributions are retained above 5 × 10 −18 in fractional frequency or 0.1 ps in one-way timing half-amplitude after mean-rate removal over specified intervals. Diagnostics use GMM-3 gravity through degree and order 120; exact point-mass Sun, Phobos, and Deimos tidal potentials with origin and dipole terms removed; and checks of stationary-model local c −4 terms and external-perturber scales. Low-Mars-orbit, areostationary, Phobos- and Deimos-distance, and highly elliptical relay regimes are evaluated. In leading monopole estimates relative to the adopted surface scale, a clock in a 300 km near-polar circular orbit is slower by 4.56 μ s day −1 , while areostationary and Deimos-distance clocks are faster by 9.13 and 9.52 μ s day −1 , respectively. The direct Mars J 2 timing line is about 87 ps at 300 km altitude and remains several picoseconds near areostationary radius for latitude-varying areosynchronous cases; perihelion-scaled subpicosecond solar tides require retention in high relay orbits. The hierarchy separates mandatory, regime-dependent, and subthreshold corrections. The result is a reference system and model-retention framework, not an operational Mars time ephemeris: realization requires consistent ephemerides, Mars orientation and seasonal-gravity models, spacecraft orbit-determination solutions, calibrated link delays, and covariance analysis. Seasonal low-degree gravity from CO 2 exchange is a leading surface-realization term that must be modeled, monitored, or empirically bounded before subpicosecond surface timing can be claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slava G. Turyshev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: