Why the study?
Establishing the specific cause of mechanical prosthetic valve stenosis is crucial for deciding between medical therapy and surgical reintervention, yet visualizing pannus with diagnostic imaging remains challenging and not always feasible.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case report demonstrates that severe mechanical aortic valve stenosis can result from a circumferential subvalvular pannus membrane despite preserved leaflet mobility on fluoroscopy and adequate anticoagulation, requiring multimodality assessment and surgical re-intervention rather than fibrinolysis.
Multimodality imaging is essential to distinguish pannus from thrombosis in mechanical valves; this case extends the differential but leaves management algorithms open.
A mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction carries a high risk of hospitalization and patient death. It may show up as stenosis of the valve prosthesis or intra/paraprosthetic regurgitation. Prosthetic stenosis, in turn, may be caused by granulation tissue (pannus), thrombosis, a combination of pannus and thrombosis, a prosthesis mechanical defect, or a unique surgical technique. Establishing the specific cause of prosthetic stenosis is of crucial importance for the therapeutic behavior. Prosthetic thrombosis requires conservative intensification of anticoagulation/fibrinolysis or surgical treatment in an accelerated/emergency manner. When the cause of the thrombosis is pannus, a mechanical defect, or surgical technique, the only treatment option is cardiac surgical reintervention. The manifestation of granulation tissue (pannus) is indicative of a non-immune reaction to the prosthetic valve and suture material following prosthetic valve replacement. The basis of this phenomenon is the growth of fibroelastic tissue associated with an increase in the expression of transforming growth factor beta. [1] In a small proportion of patients with implanted prosthetic valves, the growth of pannus leads to subvalvular obstruction of blood flow and results in prosthetic stenosis. Despite the technological advancements in imaging diagnostics, visualizing pannus remains challenging and not always feasible. Consequently, we employ a multifaceted approach that incorporates anamnestic, clinical, and imaging methods to reach a diagnosis. Operative exploration is the only method by which definitive confirmation can be obtained. The objective of this article was twofold: first, to present a rare case of stenosis of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis due to a circumferential shaft of granulation tissue (pannus) forming a kind of de novo subaortic membrane; and second, to outline an algorithm for the diagnosis of prosthetic valve stenosis and differential diagnosis between thrombosis and pannus as the cause of valve dysfunction. The following case study presents a patient who met the surgical treatment indications due to stenosis of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. The clinical information and imaging studies indicated that the prosthetic dysfunction was likely due to the presence of granulation tissue (pannus). The intraoperative finding revealed a circumferential shaft of granulation tissue, forming a novel subaortic membrane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimitrov et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Mechanical aortic valve prosthesis stenosis due to subvalvular pannus formation (n=1). Surgical re-intervention (Wheat operation: aortic valve re-replacement with SJM Regent Size 25 mechanical prosthesis and ascending aorta replacement) was evaluated on Intraoperative confirmation of prosthetic stenosis etiology and postoperative clinical recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: