Current guidelines recommend the use of multi-lumen central venous access for the infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) [ 1 , 2 ]. While options include placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), central venous catheter (CVC), or implanted venous access via a port-a-cath [ 1 ], PICC use is predominant [ 2 , 3 ], mainly due to hypothetical concern for potential deleterious effects of shear stress enacted on CAR T-cells when infused through the angled port Huber needle, as these cells may be more susceptible to mechanical stresses [ 4 , 5 ]. However, there is no current data to support this practice. Investigating this question is clinically relevant, because most patients may already have a port due to prior systemic therapies, and the addition of a PICC line and possible removal of the port frequently represents an inconvenience for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunzeker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: