Purpose Examining the effects of different pathway shapes on walking performance, particularly under cognitive load, is important for understanding motor control in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) under real-life conditions. This study aimed to investigate the effects of walking on different pathway shapes and dual-tasking (DT) on spatiotemporal gait parameters in individuals with PD.Materials and Methods A prospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 50 individuals diagnosed with PD. Participants were initially assessed using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the Dual-Task Questionnaire (DTQ), and the Modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES). Subsequently, spatiotemporal characteristics of the 4-Meter Walk Test (4MWT), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Figure-of-8 Walk Test (F8WT), and L Test were measured under single-task and DT conditions.Results In all tests, dual-task conditions significantly increased duration and step count (p < 0.05). The F8WT showed multiple spatiotemporal impairments (p < 0.05). The highest duration and step count costs were in the 4-MWT (p < 0.001), while the highest speed and step length costs were in the TUG (p ≤ 0.030). For correlations, 4-MWT duration and step count/time positively correlated with UPDRS-III (r ≥ 0.307,p < 0.05), while F8WT cadence (r= −0.310, p = 0.034) and TUG duration (r= −0.426,p = 0.003) correlated with UPDRS-III and mGES, respectively. DTQ selectively correlated with speed and length across tests (p < 0.05).Conclusions Dual-task conditions impair both straight and shaped walking in PD. While 4-MWT exhibits higher time-space costs, DTQ and UPDRS-III selectively determine dual-task performance across different pathway shapes. Integrating both straight and curved paths under cognitive load provides a more comprehensive approach for clinical assessment and rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özden et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: