Background Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission is a critical event in the cancer trajectory and is associated with substantial mortality. Medication-related vulnerabilities and healthcare-access barriers may contribute to acute deterioration but remain insufficiently studied together. Objective To identify medication-related and healthcare-access factors independently associated with unplanned ICU admission among adults with cancer. Methods This hospital-based case-control study was conducted at a tertiary oncology centre. Cases were adults with cancer with unplanned ICU admission (n = 150), and controls were adults with cancer admitted to wards or day-care units without ICU requirement (n = 150), frequency-matched by age group, sex, and cancer type. Medication vulnerabilities and healthcare-access barriers were assessed using medical records and structured interviews. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Cases had higher prevalence of polypharmacy (64.0% vs 38.7%), clinically significant drug-drug interactions (42.0% vs 20.7%), and medication non-adherence (51.3% vs 29.3%). Financial barriers (58.7% vs 34.7%) and delayed care-seeking (46.0% vs 24.0%) were also more frequent. After adjustment, financial barriers (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.34–3.99), drug-drug interactions (2.14, 1.19–3.85), delayed care-seeking (2.08, 1.16–3.72), polypharmacy (2.05, 1.21–3.47), and non-adherence (1.94, 1.12–3.36) remained independently associated with unplanned ICU admission. ICU mortality was 32.0%. Conclusion Medication vulnerabilities and healthcare-access barriers were associated with unplanned ICU admission. These findings identify potentially modifiable areas for further evaluation, but the case-control design does not establish that interventions targeting these factors would directly reduce ICU admissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Begum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: