Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-assembled nanomaterial-based wound dressings are emerging platforms for cutaneous wound repair. These materials have been reported to provide antimicrobial activity, antibiofilm effects, hemostatic support, wound monitoring, and tissue-regenerative functions. This structured narrative review summarizes primary studies evaluating self-assembled or self-assembling nanoscale materials for cutaneous wound applications. A structured PubMed search was conducted on 9 June 2026 using predefined Boolean terms and PubMed filters for Free full text, English, Humans, and Other Animals. Eligible studies assessed a dressing, scaffold, hydrogel, film, patch, bandage, or topical biomaterial containing at least one nanoscale component and reported at least one wound-related outcome. Reviews, non-cutaneous wound studies, inaccessible full texts, and studies limited to synthesis or characterization without wound-related testing were excluded. The unfiltered search retrieved 367 records; after filters, 67 records were screened, and 23 primary studies were included. Five broad material groups were represented: self-assembling peptide systems, supramolecular small-molecule systems, polymer/polysaccharide/protein-based systems, nanocellulose-based systems, and hybrid nanocomposites. Most studies were preclinical: 17 combined in vitro testing with animal models, four were limited to in vitro or ex vivo models, and two were animal-only in vivo studies. No human clinical studies meeting the eligibility criteria were identified among the included studies. Overall, self-assembly provides a flexible design principle for multifunctional wound dressings, but the current evidence remains predominantly preclinical and requires further translational validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altamımı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: