Parity under the central inversion is constant on every Galois orbit of the C60 adjacency spectrum. The even and odd characteristic polynomials are (x - 3)(x + 2)⁴(x - 1)⁹(x² + 3x + 1)³(x² - x - 3)⁵ and (x² + x - 4)⁴(x² + x - 1)⁵(x⁴ - 3x³ - 2x² + 7x + 1)³, coprime over Q, so each of the eight rational irreducible factors lies wholly in one sector and parity is a property of the minimal polynomial rather than of the individual eigenvalue. Two things follow. The golden levels are two orbits and not one family with an exception: x² + x - 1, with roots 1/φ and -φ at multiplicity five, is odd, while x² + 3x + 1, with roots -1/φ² and -φ² at multiplicity three, is even, and no inversion-even operator couples them at any order. And parity is the finest label that survives conjugation, because the two three-dimensional icosahedral characters are irrational and every orbit carrying one carries the other in equal number. Here x² + 3x + 1 splits over Q(√5) into the T₁ branch x + 1/φ² and the T₂ branch x + φ², and the quartic splits as (x² - φ²x - 1/φ²)(x² - 1/φ²x - φ²), carrying T₁ twice and T₂ twice, with exact five-fold characters 1 + √5 and 1 - √5. Constancy is a fact about this graph and not a theorem about free involutions. Along the inversion-symmetric weighting A_ph + tA_hh it fails at exactly two positive values, 5φ/2 and 5φ³/3, where one level is sixfold with three even and three odd dimensions and another sevenfold with four even and three odd. It fails on 13 of 300 random inversion-symmetric cubic cages of the same size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason Almasy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: