Key result
Structured CMR reporting linked to ~25-point higher LGE pattern documentation vs unstructured reports.
Why the study?
Although late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a key biomarker in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, the completeness of its reporting in routine clinical impressions remains incompletely characterized.
Does structured reporting and large language model (LLM)-assisted impression generation improve the completeness of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern, distribution, and severity documentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) impressions for ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared to unstructured human reporting?
Observational (n=10,878)
No
Does structured reporting and large language model (LLM)-assisted impression generation improve the completeness of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern, distribution, and severity documentation in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) impressions for ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared to unstructured human reporting?
Structured reporting improves LGE pattern documentation in CMR impressions, while LLM-assisted impression generation—especially when fine-tuned on heterogeneous unstructured reports—significantly improves the completeness of LGE distribution and severity documentation.
Structured and LLM-assisted reporting may enhance LGE documentation completeness in CMR; leaves open effects on clinical decisions or outcomes.
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a key diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). However, the completeness of LGE reporting in routine CMR impressions remains incompletely characterized. We aimed to evaluate the impact of large language model (LLM)-assisted reporting on the consistency of LGE pattern, distribution, and severity documentation in CMR impressions for ICM and NICM. We analyzed 828 unstructured (1990–2023) and 400 structured (2024–2025) CMR reports to identify documentation of LGE pattern, distribution, and severity. A Llama 3 language model fine-tuned on 27,000 structured CMR reports was used to generate 9650 CMR impressions; LGE attributes were extracted using an LLM judge. LLM reporting behavior was further assessed using quantized low-rank adaptation adapters trained on structured and unstructured impressions. Structured reporting captured LGE pattern more frequently than unstructured reporting overall (85.5% vs. 61.0%, p = 9.60 × 10 −7 ) and for ICM (90.0% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.005). LLM-generated impressions demonstrated more frequent reporting of LGE distribution (75.3%) and severity (70.9%) versus structured and unstructured reports ( p < 0.001). Fine-tuning with an adapter trained on unstructured impressions significantly improved reporting of all three LGE attributes. Structured reporting improved LGE pattern documentation, but gaps in LGE distribution and severity documentation persisted across human report formats. LLM-generated impressions achieved broader attribute coverage for LGE distribution and severity. Fine-tuning on unstructured data improved model performance, suggesting that passive augmentation with data capturing the documentation styles of multiple providers may help to address reporting gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (n=10,878). Structured reporting and Llama 3.1 LLM-assisted CMR impression generation vs. Unstructured clinical CMR reporting was evaluated on Documentation of LGE pattern in LGE-positive clinical CMR impressions (structured vs unstructured) (p=9.60 × 10^-7). Structured reporting increased LGE pattern documentation vs unstructured reports (85.5% vs 61.0%, p<0.001), while LLM impressions increased distribution (75.3%) and severity (70.9%) reporting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: