Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vermicomposting of chromium-laden tannery sludge is widely reported to remove 30–96% of the metal, but such figures rest on concentration change alone. We tested this in 60-day mass-closed reactors, comparing composting with vermicomposting by Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae, with and without bamboo biochar. Against a nominal baseline corrected for measured dry-matter loss, the composting control at matched sludge loading recovered 102.7% of the expected chromium and the vermicomposting treatments only 35.4–44.4%. Chromium cannot volatilise or drain from these reactors; the exchangeable plus carbonate-bound pool never exceeded 0.75%, and earthworm biomass could hold at most 0.8% of the missing chromium, so the deficit is not due to removal. Chromium shifted towards the Fe–Mn oxide-bound fraction (72.6–74.4%) in three out of four vermicomposting treatments, consistent with retention in a form that partial acid digestion does not fully liberate, pending confirmation by total decomposition. Across thirteen elements, the deficit was unrelated to biological essentiality, and inert titanium returned 46.9% apparent removal. Hexavalent chromium fell further under vermicomposting (30.6–45.1% of expected) than under composting (55.3–67.8%), most consistently with biochar. Vermicomposting detoxifies and immobilises chromium without removing it; reuse should be judged on mobility, speciation, and total recoverable chromium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mongchu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: