Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
China’s CO 2 emissions trading system, the world’s largest, aims to significantly reduce CO 2 emissions. The system is a tradable performance standard (TPS), differing from cap and trade (C&T). We provide a dynamic general equilibrium assessment that uniquely considers institutional and fiscal features of China that affect policy costs and distributional impacts. Key findings: The TPS’s environmental benefits exceed its costs by a factor of five or more. Interactions with the fiscal system reduce or eliminate the TPS’s cost disadvantage relative to C&T. Introducing auctioning as a complementary source of allowance supply can reduce costs by 30 percent. (JEL D58, O13, P28, Q54, Q58)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goulder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: