Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines algorithmised administrative discretion as a mode of exercising the general legal institution of administrative discretion in the digital environment of public administration. It defines the concept and identifies three mandatory elements: a legally established scope of choice, prior digital formalisation and a legally significant impact of the system rule on an individual decision. The concept is distinguished from automation of bound powers, technical error and hidden rulemaking. Using property-related administrative procedures as examples, the article substantiates requirements for reasoning, reconsideration by an authorised official, a legal regime for system parameters, preservation of a digital audit trail and allocation of the burden of proof. It proposes incorporating these safeguards into legislation on administrative procedures and administrative acts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maksim A. Uvarov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: