Curriculum co-creation has emerged as a transformative response to Eurocentric dominance in South African higher education, yet its role in Africanisation within Universities of Technology remains empirically underexplored. This qualitative, critical-paradigm study examined staff and student insights at the Durban University of Technology (DUT) on co-creation as a pathway to Africanisation and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4 and 10. Data were collected from three focus groups that included 10 staff, 8 undergraduate students, and were analysed thematically using Freire’s critical-conscientisation framework. Findings revealed four themes: curriculum disconnect and epistemic alienation; institutional bureaucracy and academic resistance; the centrality of student voice and agency; and language as a contested terrain. Community engagement also emerged as vital to co-creation and the documentation of indigenous knowledge. Co-creation provides a meaningful pathway to Africanisation when treated as a decolonial imperative rather than a pedagogical option. Institutionalising co-creation, integrating African knowledge systems, adopting multilingual pedagogies, and allocating adequate resources are essential to advance a socially responsive curriculum focused on quality education and reduced inequalities. Contribution: This study bridges the gap between curriculum co-creation and Africanisation within the unique context of a South African University of Technology. By centring the situated voices of staff and students at DUT, it reframes co-creation as a decolonial tool. The research argues that redistributing epistemic power is essential to dismantling Eurocentric academic structures and validating African ways of knowing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mdluli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: