Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines interaction between Russian civil society and the emerging social group of Special Military Operation participants. It uses a secondary analysis of open survey data, institutional reports and academic studies published in 2021–2026. Four levels of interaction are distinguished: institutional, horizontal, symbolic and everyday. Quantitative indicators show a substantial scale of formal support, while everyday integration and stable horizontal ties remain less measurable and less consolidated. The article identifies formalization, role reduction, weak continuity of contacts and fragmented support pathways as key barriers. It argues for a shift from a recipient-oriented model to subject participation in employment, education, volunteering and local civic life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. N. Melnikov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: