The optimal conditioning strategy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains undefined, particularly in older or medically vulnerable patients. Reduced-intensity regimens lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) but increase relapse risk. Treosulfan-based conditioning may represent an intermediate-intensity alternative, though comparative data in ALL are limited. We conducted a retrospective registry-based study including 967 adult patients with B- or T-ALL undergoing first allo-HSCT in complete remission (CR1 or CR2+) between 2012 and 2024. Patients received fludarabine-melphalan (Flu/Mel, n=778) or fludarabine-treosulfan (Flu/Treo, n=189). The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse incidence (RI), NRM, and graft-versus-host disease. Outcomes were censored at 2 years. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for clinical and transplant-related variables. Flu/Treo recipients were transplanted more recently, more often received haploidentical donors, and were more frequently beyond CR1. Median age was slightly higher in the Flu/Treo group. At 2 years, OS was 65.6% with Flu/Treo versus 60.5% with Flu/Mel, and LFS 57.2% versus 49.7%. RI was lower with Flu/Treo (24.1% vs 31.5%), while NRM was similar (18.6% vs 18.8%). In multivariable analysis, conditioning regimen did not significantly affect OS or LFS, but Flu/Treo was associated with reduced RI (HR 0.61, p=0.011) without differences in NRM. Similar results were observed in B-ALL, while no differences emerged in T-ALL. Flu/Treo was associated with a lower relapse incidence compared with Flu/Mel, particularly in patients with B-cell ALL, without an increase in non-relapse mortality. However, no significant differences were observed in overall survival or leukemia-free survival. These findings support Flu/Treo as a reasonable alternative conditioning platform for adult patients with ALL and warrant prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avenoso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: