Background and purpose Previous studies have linked lipid measures to hematoma expansion and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but prognostic evidence for the apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (ApoB/ApoA1) ratio remains limited. We examined the associations of acute-phase ApoB/ApoA1 with 90-day mortality and poor functional outcome after primary ICH and evaluated its incremental prognostic information beyond the ICH score. Methods We conducted a single-center observational cohort study of adults with primary ICH who underwent baseline CT within 72 h after symptom onset. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was poor functional outcome at 90 days. Logistic regression examined associations of ApoB/ApoA1 with outcomes in unadjusted and ICH score-adjusted models. Incremental value beyond the ICH score was assessed using discrimination, Brier score, calibration, and bootstrap internal validation. Results Among 470 included patients, 73 (15.5%) died and 190 (40.4%) had poor functional outcome at 90 days. Higher ApoB/ApoA1 was associated with lower 90-day mortality after adjustment for the ICH score (OR per 0.1-unit increase, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71–0.96; p = 0.012), but not with poor functional outcome (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.06; p = 0.531). Adding ApoB/ApoA1 to the ICH score yielded a limited increase in discrimination for 90-day mortality (ΔAUC, 0.027; bootstrap 95% CI, 0.008–0.057; likelihood-ratio p = 0.008), with little change in Brier score or calibration. No meaningful improvement was observed for poor functional outcome. Conclusion Higher acute-phase ApoB/ApoA1 was associated with lower 90-day mortality, but not poor functional outcome, after accounting for the ICH score. ApoB/ApoA1 provided limited incremental prognostic information for 90-day mortality beyond the ICH score. Clinical usefulness remains uncertain, and external validation is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: