Abstract:Drawing upon the "Three-Dual Paradigm & Four-Coherence Criteria" of Kuaijie Sinology, this paper introduces a Physical Foundation and integrates historical context, institutional logic, behavioral psychology, subject psychology and human nature as verification standards. This constitutes an independent analytical category distinct from traditional literary philology. By applying the "Dual-Layer" analytical framework to Cao Cao's Short Song, this study distinguishes the surface lyrical shell of the text from its underlying political program, taking into account both the communicative psychology of the allusion and Cao Cao’s subjective motivation, bridging the causal gaps in traditional philology and providing a reproducible, realistic interpretation that aligns with the late Han Dynasty's chaotic landscape. This paper reconstructs the core concept of "Zhou Gong spitting out food" (Zhou Gong Tu Bu). The traditional interpretation—that the Duke of Zhou spat out his food to receive guests—suffers from a broken causal chain and fundamentally reduces a grand political pattern to trivial etiquette. Instead, based on physical logic and behavioral psychology, this study interprets "Tu" (吐) as distribution and output, and "Bu" (哺) as feedback and reciprocation, analogous to the throughput of a port. The phrase thus represents the political system's capacity to both absorb talent and distribute resources, powers, and interests without monopolization. This aligns with the historical deeds of the Duke of Zhou (returning power to King Cheng and enfeoffing the realm) and Cao Cao’s political motivation and psychological expectation of sharing interests to unite the world. Surface-level poetry conceals a comprehensive political guideline for gathering talent, distributing interests, and stabilizing the realm. Conclusion Based on the "Three-Dual Paradigm & Four-Coherence Criteria" of Kuaijie Sinology, this paper utilizes the Physical Foundation, historical institutions, behavioral psychology, subject psychology, and human common sense as its verification pathways. This analytical framework is not limited to classical poetry. Rather than simply negating traditional interpretations, this system is compatible with existing readings while superimposing an independent, reusable, and reality-based verification standard. To date, parallel research sequences have been established across multiple domains, including classical poetry and prose, historical texts, excavated remains, military and political jurisprudence, construction systems, and household registration economy. This paper serves as one of the empirical chapters of the Kuaijie Sinology paradigm in the field of classical texts. Subsequent research will continuously deconstruct classic works across successive dynasties, forming a complete, verifiable, iterable, and continuously expandable research matrix. 【摘要】本文依托蒯解汉学 “三双四通” 研究范式,引入物理逻辑底座,结合历史实景、制度逻辑、行为心理学、主体心理、人性底座为核验标尺,属于区别于传统文学训诂的另一分析范畴。对曹操《短歌行》采用 “一诗双层” 的研判思路,区分文本表层抒情外壳与底层政治纲领,兼顾典故传播心理与曹操本人的主体诉求,补齐传统训诂断裂的因果链条,提供一套贴合汉末乱世格局、可复现的实景化解读版本。 综述: 本文依托蒯解汉学 “三双四通”,以物理底座、历史制度、人性常识作为核验路径,这套研判框架并不局限于古典诗词。本体系不简单否定传统阐释,而是兼容旧有解读,叠加一套独立、可复用的实景核验标尺。目前已经在古典诗文、史传文本、出土遗存、军政法理、营造制度、户籍经济等方向搭建并行研究序列。 本篇是蒯解汉学范式在古典文本领域的实证篇目之一,后续将持续推出历代经典解构,形成一套可核验、可迭代、持续拓展的完整研究矩阵。
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
蒯迎春 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: