BACKGROUND: Mindset theory has increasingly shifted from asking whether growth mindsets predict achievement to asking how, for whom, and under what conditions beliefs about intelligence become motivationally consequential. AIMS: This study contributes to that theoretical shift by examining mindset as a distal belief embedded within a broader social-cognitive system of achievement motivation. SAMPLE AND METHODS: Using PISA 2018 data on 36,905 15-year-old students in Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Hong Kong, and Beijing-Shanghai-Jiangsu-Zhejiang, China, we modeled associations among mindset, socioeconomic background, mastery goals, motivation to master school tasks, reading self-concept, general self-efficacy, fear of failure, and reading achievement through a multi-group path analysis approach. RESULTS: Model results showed that a growth mindset was positively associated with reading achievement in the Nordic countries, unrelated to achievement in Hong Kong, and negatively associated with achievement in B-S-J-Z China. Indirect effects were generally small, while reading self-concept emerged as the most consistent proximal correlate of achievement. These patterns suggest that mindset is best understood not as a universal predictor of achievement but as a context-sensitive component within culturally situated socio-cognitive systems. CONCLUSIONS: The study, therefore, uses cross-national evidence to refine the theoretical placement of mindset within achievement motivation, highlighting the importance of mechanisms, proximal competence beliefs, and cultural boundary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: