Key result
Pretreatment ticagrelor linked to ~57% lower risk of angiographic no-reflow vs deferred loading.
Why the study?
Does ticagrelor pretreatment at first medical contact reduce angiographic no-reflow compared to deferred loading before PCI in patients with STEMI?
Cohort (n=623)
Yes
Does ticagrelor pretreatment at first medical contact reduce angiographic no-reflow compared to deferred loading before PCI in patients with STEMI?
In STEMI patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor pretreatment at first medical contact was associated with a significantly lower risk of angiographic no-reflow after propensity weighting, though in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ.
Pretreatment may reduce no-reflow in STEMI; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before any practice change.
We examined the association between ticagrelor pretreatment and angiographic no-reflow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with in-hospital mortality as a secondary outcome and clinical phenotyping as an exploratory objective. In a retrospective multicentre registry (2018-2021), 623 patients referred for percutaneous coronary intervention were compared by loading strategy: pretreatment at first medical contact or deferred before PCI. Cohort-wide inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), using a clinical covariate-balancing propensity model and 50 imputations, estimated adjusted risk ratios (RRs). Outcome-blind latent class analysis preceded a treatment-weighted comparison of class-specific no-reflow risks. No-reflow occurred in 28/464 pretreated patients versus 27/159 comparators (6.0% versus 17.0%); the crude RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.22-0.58), and the IPTW-adjusted RR was 0.43 (95% CI 0.24-0.74; P = 0.003). Ten patients died (adjusted RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.13-1.67). Three classes comprised 328, 231 and 64 patients, but their pretreatment-standardised no-reflow risks did not establish prognostic separation. Ticagrelor pretreatment was associated with lower angiographic no-reflow after propensity weighting. The adjusted mortality and exploratory class-risk findings did not reach statistical significance. Residual confounding and uncertain covariate timing limit causal interpretation, and prospective validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pepe et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=623). Ticagrelor pretreatment at first medical contact vs. Deferred ticagrelor loading before PCI was evaluated on Angiographic no-reflow (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.74, p=0.003). Ticagrelor pretreatment at first medical contact was associated with lower angiographic no-reflow vs deferred loading (6.0% vs 17.0%; adjusted RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24-0.74; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: