Key result
Pre-procedural serum nutritional score profile is significantly linked to overall mortality after TAVR.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Pre-procedural nutritional status has been proposed as a prognostic marker in TAVR, but most prior studies relied on isolated nutrition scores rather than evaluating multiple serum-based nutritional scores simultaneously.
How do multiple pre-procedural serum biomarker-based nutritional scores and their principal components influence overall survival in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=459)
How do multiple pre-procedural serum biomarker-based nutritional scores and their principal components influence overall survival in patients undergoing TAVR?
Serum-based nutritional scores inconsistently classify TAVR patients despite high collinearity explained largely by a single underlying biomarker dimension (PC1), supporting an integrated rather than single-metric approach to pre-TAVR nutritional risk assessment.
Nutritional scores should not yet inform TAVR decisions; leaves open whether integrated biomarker dimensions add prognostic value beyond STS score.
Pre-procedural nutritional status has been proposed as a prognostic marker in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), although most studies rely on isolated nutrition scores. This study examined how multiple serum-based nutritional scores influence post-TAVR survival. Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR between December 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Eight serum biomarker-based scores were calculated for each patient (GNRI, PNI, CONUT, PALBI, TCBI, PACI, AGR, ALBI). Associations with overall survival were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted multivariable Cox regression. Principal component analysis (PCA) evaluated relationships among scores. A total of 459 patients were included (mean age 81.7 ± 7.1 years, 45.8% female, median STS 2.8 [1.8-4.4]). The eight scores frequently classified the same patients into different risk strata. Significant survival differences were observed for all scores' most severe stratification except CONUT (p = 0.083) and PNI (p = 0.133). In adjusted Cox models, most scores showed a statistically significant association with overall mortality, except for GNRI (p = 0.237), PALBI (p = 0.378) and TCBI (p = 0.125). PCA demonstrated substantial collinearity among several scores and highlighted a dominant first principal component (PC), PC1 = 54%, without improved discrimination compared to STS score. In the adjusted Cox model, PC1 was also significantly associated with overall mortality (p < 0.001). Despite capturing overlapping biological domains, serum-based nutritional scores inconsistently classify TAVR patients. PCA suggests that a single underlying biomarker dimension explains most of the variability among scores, highlighting overlap and inconsistency across them and supporting the need for a more integrated approach to nutritional assessment rather than single metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baudo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=459). Eight serum biomarker-based nutritional scores (GNRI, PNI, CONUT, PALBI, TCBI, PACI, AGR, ALBI) and principal component analysis (PCA) was evaluated on Overall survival / overall mortality (p=<0.001). Pre-procedural serum nutritional scores showed substantial collinearity (PC1=54%), with PC1 significantly associated with post-TAVR overall mortality in adjusted Cox models (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: