Key result
Smaller aortic valve area is linked to ~39% higher odds of severe angina per 0.1-cm² decrease.
Why the study?
Attributing exertional symptoms in patients with concurrent aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease is clinically challenging.
Are measured aortic valve area, lesion morphology, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) associated with angina severity in patients with severe high-gradient aortic stenosis and a single intermediate left anterior descending lesion?
Observational (n=190)
No
Are measured aortic valve area, lesion morphology, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) associated with angina severity in patients with severe high-gradient aortic stenosis and a single intermediate left anterior descending lesion?
In patients with severe high-gradient aortic stenosis and an intermediate LAD lesion, angina severity is independently associated with older age and smaller measured aortic valve area rather than epicardial coronary physiology indices (FFR or iFR).
Severe angina may aid risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Attributing exertional symptoms in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease is challenging. We performed a secondary analysis of a single-center prospective registry of 190 patients with severe high-gradient AS and a single intermediate left anterior descending lesion assessed with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). The primary outcome was angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class III–IV vs. II); New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV vs. II functional limitation was secondary and exploratory. Among 185 complete cases, older age (odds ratio [OR] 3.00 per decade, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84–4.87; p < 0.001) and smaller measured aortic valve area (AVA; OR 1.39 per 0.1 cm2 decrease, 95% CI 1.08–1.79; p = 0.009) were independently associated with severe angina, whereas lesion morphology, FFR, and iFR were not. No variable was independently associated with NYHA class III–IV limitation, although this analysis was underpowered. Because AVA is flow dependent and transvalvular flow and coronary microvascular function were not directly measured, the AVA association does not establish fixed valvular obstruction as the mechanism of angina. The lack of association with FFR/iFR pertains to symptom severity and does not invalidate their use for lesion-level hemodynamic assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dziewierz et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severe high-gradient aortic stenosis with a single intermediate left anterior descending artery lesion (n=190). Measured aortic valve area (AVA) and epicardial pressure-derived indices (FFR and iFR) was evaluated on Angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class III–IV vs. II) (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.79, p=0.009). Smaller aortic valve area (OR 1.39 per 0.1 cm2 decrease, 95% CI 1.08–1.79) and older age (OR 3.00 per decade) were independently associated with severe angina, whereas FFR and iFR were not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: