Key result
Early rehabilitation nursing cuts 6-month MACE by ~13 percentage points vs. routine care after PCI.
Why the study?
The effect of implementing early rehabilitation nursing on cardiac function recovery and prognosis after PCI in patients with AMI needed investigation.
Does structured early rehabilitation nursing improve cardiac function indices, reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and enhance quality of life at 6 months in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=314)
Unblinded (lack of blinding noted in limitations)
Random number table method with allocation concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes
No
Does structured early rehabilitation nursing improve cardiac function indices, reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and enhance quality of life at 6 months in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Implementing a structured early rehabilitation nursing protocol within 24 hours after PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction significantly improves 6-month cardiac function, exercise capacity, and quality of life while reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to routine nursing.
Supports adoption of structured early rehabilitation nursing post-PCI in AMI; extends prior evidence on cardiac rehabilitation benefits.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of implementing early rehabilitation nursing on the recovery of cardiac function indices and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients diagnosed with AMI and treated with PCI between March 2020 and May 2024 were selected as the study participants. This was a prospective randomised controlled trial; patients were randomly allocated to an observation group and a control group using a random number table method (157 cases per group). The control group received routine nursing after surgery, whereas the observation group received structured early rehabilitation nursing. After 6 months of intervention, cardiac function indices, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Cardiac function indices included stroke volume (SV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Measurement Brief Form was used to evaluate quality of life. After nursing intervention, the levels of SV, LVEF and 6MWD in the cardiac function indices of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, whereas the levels of LVEDV were lower than those of the control group; the differences between the two groups were significant ( p < 0.05). The total incidence of MACE in the observation group was lower than that in the control group ( p < 0.05). In the comparison of quality-of-life scores, the observation group scored higher than the control group in five domains ( p < 0.05). Early rehabilitation nursing for patients with AMI can effectively improve patients’ cardiac function indices and reduce the risk of MACE, thereby improving their quality of life. ISRCTN18094960.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=314). Structured early rehabilitation nursing vs. Routine nursing (postoperative education, 12 h bed rest, assisted ambulation starting on postoperative day 3, discharge guidance) was evaluated on Total incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of angina pectoris, arrhythmia, and coronary restenosis) at 6 months (ARR 12.74%, p=0.021). Structured early rehabilitation nursing significantly reduced 6-month MACE incidence compared with routine nursing (8.28% vs. 21.02%, p=0.021) in AMI patients after PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: