Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Well-being is central to person-centred nursing, but its meaning remains conceptually unstable. This review mapped and analysed representations of well-being in person-centred nursing and care literature and examined how the Epicurean concepts of aponia and ataraxia might contribute to its theoretical reconstruction. Methods We conducted a scoping review incorporating a Walker and Avant-informed concept analysis and a critical philosophical-interpretive synthesis, following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR. PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and supplementary Google Scholar searches identified contemporary nursing evidence and relevant Epicurean scholarship. Evidence was charted descriptively; nursing sources were analysed for uses, attributes, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents of well-being, and the two evidence streams were compared through a structured conceptual matrix. Results Of 1,600 records identified, 26 sources were included: 20 empirical nursing sources and six philosophical sources. Nursing evidence represented well-being as multidimensional, individualised, experiential, relational and dynamic. Six interrelated attributes were identified: autonomy and agency; meaning and meaningful engagement; relational connection and communication; positive affect, engagement and vitality; freedom from suffering and psychological distress; and quality of everyday life and personally valued living. Epicurean analysis identified aponia, ataraxia, stable pleasure, rational desire management and freedom from fear as relevant philosophical resources. Their integration supported a reconstruction in which freedom from avoidable bodily suffering and excessive mental disturbance complements, rather than replaces, autonomy, meaning, relationships, participation and personally valued living. Conclusions Well-being in person-centred nursing is better understood as living well according to the person's values and priorities than as a single clinical or psychological outcome. Aponia and ataraxia offer complementary normative anchors, but the proposed framework remains theoretically generative and requires empirical evaluation across diverse nursing contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kashani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: