Leadership turnover in China’s provincial governments disrupts the multi-year investment commitments that drive industrial upgrading, yet whether this cost appears immediately or compounds as policy continuity erodes remains unclear. Officials expecting short tenures have little incentive to defend a predecessor’s unfinished projects, so the cost of turnover should depend less on the leadership change itself than on how long the resulting discontinuity is allowed to persist. Using a province-year panel spanning 1992–2023, we construct a novel High-quality Industrial Structure (HIS) index from provincial sectoral shares. Officials with six or more years of tenure raise HIS significantly relative to those with under two years. An instrumental-variables design exploiting the fixed timing of National Party Congresses confirms that turnover causes this decline rather than merely correlating with it. A local-projection analysis further shows that the cost is not immediate but emerges only after a lag of roughly three years. Mechanism analysis indicates that this operates through a policy-continuity channel: turnover destabilizes discretionary capital spending far more than fixed recurrent spending. The evidence suggests that cadre evaluation tied to short-run outcomes penalizes continuity, and that protecting multi-year capital commitments may matter more than reforming the rotation system itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: