Mathematics instruction aims to equip students with problem-solving skills, which constitute an essential competency for them. This ability encompasses more than just finding the correct answer; it involves a comprehensive cognitive process—ranging from understanding the problem and formulating a mathematical model to solving the model and accurately interpreting the results. This study aimed to determine the improvement in mathematical problem-solving skills among students taught using the GeoGebra-based Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model compared to those receiving conventional instruction on the topic of 3D shapes (spatial geometry). A quantitative experimental approach was employed, specifically a quasi-experimental design using a non-equivalent control group design. The Mann-Whitney U test performed on the gain scores of the experimental and control classes yielded a Mann-Whitney U value of 52.500, a Z-value of -4.665, and an Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000. Since the significance value was lower than the 0.05 threshold (0.000 < 0.05), the null hypothesis (H₀) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (H₁) was accepted. It can be concluded that there is a significant difference in gain scores between the experimental and control classes, indicating a significant difference in the improvement of learning outcomes achieved by the two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meilani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: