Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper introduces the Integrative Theory of Science (ITS; German: Integrative Wissenschaftstheorie, IWT) as a universal, cross-disciplinary epistemological and methodological framework. The objective of ITS is to systematically decode subjective first-person experiences, phenomenological reports, as well as traditional and lifeworld transmissions across all branches of science, translating them into falsifiable, objectively measurable third-person hypotheses. Whereas Karl Popper's critical rationalism (1959) governs the testing of existing theories within the context of justification, ITS closes a fundamental methodological gap within the context of discovery. To this end, the paper defines a universally applicable four-step translation protocol: (1) Phenomenological isolation via the 4-Factor Model, (2) Structural mapping onto established system models of the respective discipline based on strict isomorphism criteria, (3) Deductive hypothesis generation including a universal exclusion and falsification criterion, and (4) Multimodal empirical cross-validation. After formalizing this methodology in the opening chapters as a general tool for all empirical sciences, its practical performance is demonstrated through an exemplary cross-domain proof of concept using published secondary data: first, via paradoxical sympathetic trunk activation (electrical skin conductivity [EDA/SCL], heart rate variability [HRV] accompanied by corresponding central neural dynamics, captured via electroencephalography (EEG, measuring electrical brain activity/brainwaves) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI, neuroimaging of cerebral activity) during Kundalini meditation (Corby et al. 1978; Peng et al. 1999; Lazar et al. 2000; Arambula et al. 2001); second, via somatosensory pain network activation (dACC, anterior insula, S2) and catecholaminergic myocardial dysfunction (Takotsubo cardiomyopathy) in acute heartbreak (Eisenberger et al. 2003; Wittstein et al. 2005; Kross et al. 2011); and third, via pre-attentive somatic markers (SCR) in intuitive risk decisions (Bechara et al. 1997). Finally, the paper formulates three novel, prospective research protocols (Novel Predictions)—including a combined gastric and intestinal recording of the entire abdominal cavity—to demonstrate the immediate applicability of ITS for future empirical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philipp Luedtke (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: