Why do elite coalitions in some electoral authoritarian regimes hold together when shrinking rents, contested legitimacy, and credible exit options should produce defection? The post-Soviet “blackmail state” literature shows that rulers cultivate complicity as a leash, but this explains why compromised elites fear defection, not why they cease to want it. This article identifies a mechanism—accomplice-making—through which dictators convert pragmatic collaborators into self-binding partisans by conditioning power on publicly attributable transgression. It unfolds in three stages: transgression as entry fee, complicity as allegiance token and sunk cost, and dissonance generating ideological internalisation. Paired post-Soviet comparisons illustrate the argument, with implications for authoritarian resilience and Western coalition-fracture strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muk Yan Wong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: